Group sprawl is the uncontrolled and unplanned growth of groups or teams within an organization's digital workspace. It often happens on platforms such as Office 365 and Microsoft Teams.
Numerous teams without a clear purpose cause various discrepancies. Read on to find out how this issue can be addressed!
When teams or departments create their own groups separately, without coordination, it leads to many disconnected and sometimes useless groups. This is what we call Group Sprawl. This lack of governance leads to confusion, ownership issues, and security risks.
For example, imagine an organization using Microsoft Teams for project collaboration. Different departments or project teams, each with the freedom to create their own Teams or groups, start doing so without considering the broader organizational structure or goals. As a result, you may end up with many Teams, many of which serve similar purposes or have unclear objectives.
In this article, we will cover all aspects of group sprawl and how you can mitigate it.
The ease of creating and deploying new Teams, facilitated by Microsoft Teams, 365 Groups, and SharePoint, significantly contributes to group sprawl.
With remote work on the rise and increased reliance on collaboration tools, teams can create groups without involving central IT. While this speeds up adoption, it also results in losing control over new Team creation, potentially leading to thousands of scattered groups across organizational tenants.
Further, managing numerous groups poses challenges for a company's secure growth. Although linking group memberships with IT ticketing enhances productivity, it overlooks crucial factors in access control decisions, each carrying significant security implications:-
Consequently, IT teams struggle to comprehend the reasons behind specific group creations and associated access rights, hindering the establishment of efficient group management processes.
Let's delve into why group sprawl happens, uncovering what causes teams to grow out of control, and highlighting key factors in different digital platforms.
To address group sprawl in SaaS environments, organizations should establish clear governance policies, provide adequate training and support for users, implement robust administrative controls, regularly review and rationalize existing groups, and leverage automation where possible to streamline group management processes.
Group sprawl within Office 365 and Microsoft Teams environments can have significant and diverse effects. As numerous teams multiply without clear purposes or coordination, various challenges arise, impacting the overall efficiency and organization of the digital workspace.
Addressing group sprawl requires effective group management strategies, clear team creation guidelines, and a collaborative culture aligned with organizational goals. By doing so, organizations can enhance the efficiency, organization, and security of their Office 365 and Microsoft Teams environments.
In the context of Office 365, Teams Sprawl or Office 365 Group Sprawl refers to a situation where teams or groups are created and spread without adequate oversight and management. This unchecked growth can result in various visible and underlying issues within the digital workspace.
Visible Signs:
Underlying Consequences:
Let's explore these strategies that help organizations effectively manage the challenges associated with MS Teams or Office 365 Groups sprawl.
Establish and enforce clear governance policies delineating precise guidelines for the creation and management of groups within the Office 365 environment. These policies serve as a foundational framework, ensuring consistency, compliance, and purposeful group creation aligned with organizational objectives.
Conduct periodic and thorough audits to assess the landscape of Office 365 groups or MS Teams. This involves identifying redundant or underutilized groups, enabling organizations to make informed decisions about consolidation or removal. Regular audits contribute to the optimization of the digital workspace, minimizing the risk of sprawl and enhancing overall efficiency.
Integrate automation tools to streamline the entire lifecycle of group creation, management, and monitoring. Automation ensures consistent application of governance policies, reduces manual workload, and enhances overall efficiency. These third-party tools contribute to a more organized and controlled environment, minimizing the risk of unmanaged group proliferation.
Establish a centralized system for managing access requests, responsible for reviewing and approving requests for group creation. This proactive approach prevents spontaneous and uncontrolled growth by requiring a structured approval process. Centralized management ensures that new groups align with organizational objectives and contribute meaningfully to collaboration without unnecessary redundancy.
By proactively implementing these multifaceted strategies, organizations can identify and mitigate the challenges associated with Office 365 Groups or Microsoft Teams sprawl. This comprehensive approach fosters a digitally organized, secure, and purposeful collaborative environment within the Office 365 ecosystem. Ultimately, it enhances productivity and reduces potential risks.
In conclusion, organizations can effectively locate and manage inactive Office 365 groups or Teams by following the above-given methods. Further, if you’re looking for a well-organized, secure, and responsive access environment, Zluri is right here.
Zluri offers a unified access management solution designed for the modern enterprise. It serves as a singular platform that seamlessly consolidates access control across the entire user lifecycle, encompassing shadow applications.
Its access control solution empowers organizations to control group sprawl by offering centralized access management, policy-based controls, granular access permissions, automated workflows, and real-time visibility. This comprehensive approach ensures efficient access management and strengthens security protocols and regulatory compliance.
Tackle all the problems caused by decentralized, ad hoc SaaS adoption and usage on just one platform.